Thomas Hauck
Toggle Menu

My 1-2-3 Formula to Writing a Business Book

Every business or management book seeks to solve a problem for the entrepreneur, corporate leader, or manager who picks it up. The reader faces a challenge—say, stagnant revenues, lack of innovation, employee disengagement—and looks to the author for answers. The author is like an expert consultant, accessible through their printed book, ebook, or audiobook at a relatively cheap price.

Writing—or in my case, ghostwriting—a business book takes discipline and knowledge of the genre. Businesspeople are busy and they don’t have time to read at a leisurely pace, as if they were lounging on the beach on a hot summer day. To keep their attention, you need to be concise and pack every page with actionable information.

I said that every business book solves a problem. To be more precise, the overarching challenge will usually consist of many smaller problems combining together. One small problem can cascade into another, until all the ripples combine into one mighty tsunami.

To be effective, a non-fiction business book must follow my 1-2-3 Formula for Success. Here it is.

1. State the problem. This may seem obvious, but surprisingly, many ghostwriters and authors don’t understand the importance of clearly outlining the challenge to be overcome. The reader has to know they have chosen the right book! They want answers to their problem, not a bunch of platitudes that could apply to anyone.

This step has another important qualification to it: The statement of the problem needs to be very brief. It needs to be just detailed enough to make the reader interested, but not so long as to become boring. I’ve seen too many business books that drone on about the problem and every possible aspect of it, when the reader knows all too well what their difficulty is, and just wants answers! So keep this first section short and concise. Describing a problem is easy, but solving it is the hard part, which makes the solution valuable.

2. State your solution. You’re the expert! Reveal, in your own words, how the reader can solve their problem. It may be changing the company culture, offering better compensation, renewing the focus on excellence, spearheading product or service innovation, changing the attitude of the leaders—as the author, this is your job to define. It’s what the reader is paying for. Make your solution simple, clear, and actionable.

3. Offer proof in the form of third-party validation. In step #2, you were basically telling the reader what to do to solve their problem. But there’s no reason why the reader should believe you. To bolster your case, you need to cite a reliable, third-party source. It could be a true story from your own career—for example, this approach worked very well for Jocko Willink and Leif Babin, both ex-Navy SEALs, who wrote, Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win. The book was based on their shared experience patrolling the dangerous streets of Ramadi, Iraq, which they translated to business applications.

Lacking your own real-life stories, you can use your own proprietary research (your old college papers or grad school thesis can sometimes find new life!) or cite case studies of other companies. If you can’t find a juicy tidbit on your own, you should be able to find newspaper or journal articles that are reliable. No matter how you do it, you need to find stories, either on the free internet or through a subscription platform such as JSTOR or Oxford Academic, that will credibly validate your solution.

Those are the three steps: Describe the problem, offer the solution, and validate it with evidence. You do this over and over again throughout your book until the mosaic comes together into a clear picture. This is what Willink and Babin did. The overarching theme of the Extreme Ownership book was that you could boost organizational outcomes and meet goals by taking personal responsibility whenever possible. Each story addressed a facet of this problem and added a piece to the overall solution.

Posted in Advice on Hiring a Ghostwriter, Business Books, Self-Help Books | Leave a comment

How the Economy Affects Trends in Self-Help Books

I’ve been ghostwriting and editing non-fiction books and novels since late 2007. As you’ll recall, that was the beginning of the Great Recession. It lingered for years, wreaking havoc on our national economy and way of life. The US gross domestic product fell by 4.3 percent, making it the deepest recession since World War II. The GDP decline wasn’t reversed until more than three years after the calamity first entered our lives.

The unemployment rate more than doubled, soaring to 10 percent in October 2009. Home prices plummeted roughly 30 percent and foreclosures were rampant. Retirement funds took a hit as the S&P 500 index fell by 57 percent between 2007 and 2009, and didn’t fully recover until 2013.

What a time to launch a business as a sole proprietor!

Luckily I found clients, and I ghostwrote a lot of books on one subject in particular: How to get a job. I wrote books on how to prepare for a job interview, how to dress for success, how to network. I wrote one about how to get a job teaching English in South Korea. There was another about how to learn public speaking.

Some career books taught readers how to ditch their horrible jobs and make money on the internet. I ghostwrote and edited books on how to retire and structure your financial portfolio for lasting income. More than one book revealed how to buy a sailboat and cruise around the Caribbean for nine months out of the year, taking refuge on land only during hurricane season.

There was another self-help category that (sadly) was very big: How to avoid foreclosure on your house, and how to take advantage of Federal programs to ease the process. Millions of homes were under foreclosure and real estate agents wanted to write these books to enhance their professional standing. On the flip side, I wrote books about how to invest in distressed and foreclosed properties. One person’s disaster could become an opportunity for someone else.

The Shift to Success Books

As the economy improved and the unemployment rate fell to historic lows by 2019, I was no longer asked to write books on how to get a job or how to avoid foreclosure. The market for such books had dried up because everyone had a job and the housing market had recovered. The market shifted to books about leadership and how to manage employees. I wrote books about scrum and lean manufacturing, and employee harassment, and how to communicate effectively. A consistent topic has been innovation, and how to make it a vital part of your company’s everyday activities.

This trend has continued to this day. The focus is on how to be happy at work, how to lower your stress on the job, and how to climb the ladder of success. How to become influential, both in your industry and in your community, is another popular subject.

Medical and health books are consistently in demand. I recently ghostwrote a book that shows you how to start a program of intermittent fasting. I’ve been asked to write books about the Paleo diet and other diets that help you become, and stay, more healthy. Chronic pain and lifestyle diseases are big self-help topics, as well as stress and depression.

A new subject is artificial intelligence. In the past two years I’ve ghostwritten several books about the use of AI in the healthcare industry and for the delivery of government services. These books are challenging because they can quickly become dated!

About ten percent of my business is fiction ghostwriting. More people than you might imagine want to put their name on a novel and are happy to pay me to write it for them. They’re mostly thrillers, but one of my favorite projects was ghostwriting a 90,000-word historical novel that traced three generations of a family during the 20th century, from Paris to Boston to Los Angeles.

Artificial Intelligence Enters the Scene

I’m not feeling any competition from ChatGPT and other tools that allow people to quickly and cheaply write something they can call a “book.” I see many job listings on sites like Upwork placed by people who want a 30,000-word self-help book written for $500 or less. My instinct tells me that these people wouldn’t have been my clients anyway, and that they represent an expansion of the marketplace into new people who see a new opportunity. The serious clients who would hire me to write their manuscript are still there, and they’re not interested in putting their name on a generic, boring book that no one will read. And they also know a secret: Once you put a book up for sale on Amazon, and it has an ISBN number, it never goes away. So if you publish a cheap and quick Chat GPT book just to have your name out there, you’re going to be stuck with it forever, even after you come to your senses and take it off the market. It will be marked “out of print,” but it will linger there like an unwelcome houseguest.

Publishing on Amazon is forever. When you take your shot, make sure it’s your very best!

Posted in Business Books, Essays, Self-Help Books | Leave a comment

The Peculiar Freedom of the Ghostwriter

While I write fiction under my own name, I make a living as a ghostwriter. I get paid to write books for my valued clients. All kinds of books: novels and non-fiction topics including self-help, business, healthcare, nutrition, and public policy. I write and my clients send me money. In the past twenty years I’ve written at least one hundred books. I don’t know for certain because I’ve lost count, but five per year is a ballpark estimate.

As for the publication success of the manuscripts I deliver, I don’t know what happens to most of them. Every once in a while I search for my literary children on Amazon. Some never appear. Others hit best-seller status and get hundreds of five-star reviews. It makes no difference to me.

I’m always interested in discussions among my fellow scribes about writer’s block. This malady seems very common, and wise people write endless essays and advice columns offering tips and suggestions on how to overcome this terrible affliction. I won’t go into all the various tricks and techniques. Suffice to say there are a lot of them!

Erica Jong offered some pretty good insight into writer’s block: “All writing problems are psychological problems. Blocks usually stem from the fear of being judged. If you imagine the world listening, you’ll never write a line. That’s why privacy is so important. You should write first drafts as if they will never be shown to anyone.”

It’s interesting that when you’re a mercenary like me, you know you will have at least one keenly interested reader: your client. When your client is happy with your writing, they’ll keep paying you. If they get bored or disillusioned, or you fail to deliver, they’ll stop paying you. It’s a very simple transaction.

The books I write for my clients do not bear my name. I’m as anonymous as the guy who made the paper on which the book is printed. In a peculiar way, this eliminates the psychological problem highlighted by Erica Jong. This anonymity, combined with the pressure to deliver and get paid, wipes away the fear of being judged by the marketplace. I’m insulated from its ego-damaging effects.

Writer’s Block Is Not an Option

To hit my income goal, I need to write 2,500 words per day. If I don’t deliver, I don’t get paid. This is a powerful incentive to get the job done. For me, writer’s block is an unimaginable luxury. I have a blank page in front of me and I need to fill it with professional quality, nutritious writing. I get paid to solve creative problems for my client, not surrender to them.

In a sense, I’m at the extreme opposite end of the spectrum from Erica Jong. She advises to write for no one, but do it solely for the pleasure of writing. Write because it’s fun and keeps you busy. This will give you psychological freedom, and she’s right about that. At the other end of the spectrum, you can write as if failure to deliver means you will not eat or pay your rent. That has a powerful clarifying effect and gives you another form of freedom, which can lead you to write more books than you ever imagined you could.

Of course, the big caveat is that my client chooses the subject. If my client wants a self-help book about eating disorders, that’s what I write. If my client wants a thriller about the president of the United States getting AIDS while in office, that’s what I write. Right now, I’m writing two books. One is all about human skin and the other is a legal/medical novel about an alcoholic lawyer. I work on one and then the other, back and forth. Writer’s block is not an option!

Unless you’re getting paid to write, my best advice is to write whatever the hell you want. Just have fun. When you’re bored, stop. Put your writing away. If you want to try and get your story or novel published, let it sit for a few months. Don’t think about it. Then pull it out and look at it.

You might just say, “Hey—this is pretty good! But I have some ideas to make it better…”

Posted in Books Written by Thomas Hauck, Essays, Novels, Self-Help Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Follow the Rules—Except When You Break Them

As a professional ghostwriter of self-help and business books, an important part of my job is to help my valued client identify the problem they intend to solve for their reader, as well as its solution. The problem and solution need to be very specific. This is the first rule of self-help books.

The second rule is to define the pool of potential readers (the market). It’s possible that the problem may be shared by millions of people, such as how to lose unwanted pounds and feel healthy, or how to make your business more profitable by hiring the right people and training them properly. On the other hand, the problem may be shared by a small number of people, such as how to prevent tennis elbow or how to buy commercial real estate in New York.

Many authors try to cast their net too wide. They think that by addressing multiple problems or vague problems, they will attract more readers and sell more books. In fact, the opposite is usually true. A potential reader is going to pay money and invest many hours of their time reading a book only if it addresses their specific problem or aspiration. Books are like conversations. If you talk to your friend about a problem they’re having and you wander off-topic, or even worse, start talking about your own problem, their eyes will glaze over and they’ll soon excuse themselves.

For example, I regularly have business clients who want to write a book about, say, how to hire the best person for a job, and how to keep them happy so they’ll be engaged and stick around longer, rather than seeking a better opportunity elsewhere. Employee turnover is a significant problem these days, especially in a strong economy with low unemployment, giving labor more leverage over management. So far, so good.

But some authors suggest that their book should be written for both the manager and the employee, and that somehow it should appeal to both the person being paid and the person signing the paycheck. The reasoning is that the potential market will include more people and therefore they could sell more books.  

I must gently tell them that this is impossible. No employee wants to read a book written for managers, and no manager wants to read a book that provides career advice to employees. You must choose one or the other. It’s far better to be the expert in a small market than to be a jack-of-all-trades in a big market and end up with nothing.

The solution could be to write two books—one aimed employees and one aimed at managers.

The Exceptions Prove the Rule

Of course there are exceptions—those magical books that somehow get a big, diverse audience to focus on a common problem. A good example is The Goal, a business novel centered on management principles. It was co-authored by Eliyahu M. Goldratt, who is known for his Theory of Constraints, and Jeff Cox, a writer with several management-focused novels to his credit. First released in 1984, it presents a practical case study on operations management, particularly focusing on identifying and resolving bottlenecks using the Theory of Constraints. To date it has sold an estimated five million copies.

In terms of approach, The Goal unfolds as a fictional narrative, a style common to a few blockbuster business books. The protagonist, Alex Rogo, oversees a struggling manufacturing plant. Bill Peach, a senior executive, challenges Alex to transform his failing plant into a profitable and reliable operation within three months. Assisting Alex is Jonah, a physicist believed to be a stand-in for Goldratt, who guides him through various fundamental business concepts via phone calls and brief meetings. Alongside the business challenges, the novel also explores Alex’s personal life, particularly his marital issues.

In 2011, Time magazine recognized The Goal as one of the top 25 most pivotal business management books.

Books like The Goal, which take a more literary or artistic approach to problem-solving, are risky because a publisher cannot predict how many copies might be sold. Such a book could be a total flop, or it could—in very rare cases—be a big success. In fact, the publisher of The Goal is The North River Press, tiny company that appears to be owned by none other than Eliyahu M. Goldratt. My guess is that Mr. Goldratt couldn’t get a traditional publishing deal because editors thought his book wouldn’t sell, so he published it himself. His gamble paid off.

As I tell my valued clients, when you self-publish your book, you can break all the rules and do whatever you want!

Posted in Advice on Hiring a Ghostwriter, Business Books, Self-Help Books | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Every Novel Needs a Dynamic Opening

If you read “how to” guides on writing novels, they all agree that your story should open with some sort of action that represents a change for your protagonist. The scene should be dynamic, not static. There should be a present state moving into a different future state. Depending on the genre of your novel, your dynamic scene can be any scale, from small and subtle to big and vivid. To use the language of film, you can start with a tight, intimate shot and gradually pull back to show the larger scene, or you can start big, with a wide shot full of action, and move in closer. Either way can work, as long as there is motion. While there must be dynamism, it can be as gentle as a summer breeze or as violent as a hurricane.

The Small Opening

I’m a big fan of Ian Fleming and the James Bond books. If you haven’t read them, it might surprise you to know that while the Bond movies all start with maximum dynamism, in the form of a violent fight and chase scene, all of the original novels begin very quietly, with a subtle close-up shot. For example, the very first Bond novel, Casino Royale, published in 1953, begins with James Bond in the casino at three in the morning. He’s burned out, so he quits playing roulette and strolls over to watch his nemesis, Le Chiffre, play baccarat. After a few minutes he goes up to his room to go to sleep. After this very understated dynamic scene, Fleming unloads a few pages of description and backstory before continuing the slowly unfolding action.

The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins, also starts out small, with Katniss Everdeen waking up in the morning and thinking about her sister, Prim. But Collins drops a hint of foreboding when she casually mentions that today is the “day of reaping.” In any case, Katniss then goes out hunting in the woods, a routine activity.

Literary novels tend to open with scenes that are deliberately innocuous, mundane, and almost boring. Here’s the second paragraph from Dear Edward: A Novel, by Ann Napolitano. We’re at Newark Airport: “When the Adler family reaches the front of the line, they load their computers and shoes into trays. Bruce Adler removes his belt, rolls it up, and slots it neatly beside his brown loafers in a grey plastic bin. His sons are messier, throwing sneakers on top of laptops and wallets. Laces hang over the side of their shared tray, and Bruce can’t stop himself from tucking the loose strands inside.” It’s dynamic—the family is on the move—but gentle, easygoing. No murders here!

The Big Opening

According to the contemporary formula, thrillers must leap from the gate, fast and furious. Dan Brown’s best seller The Da Vinci Code opens big, with a prologue designed to snap the reader to attention: “Renowned curator Jacques Saunière staggered through the vaulted archway of the museum’s Grand Gallery. He lunged for the nearest painting he could see, a Carravagio. Grabbing the gilded frame, the seventy-three-year-old man heaved the masterpiece toward himself until it tore from the wall and Saunière collapsed backward in a heap beneath the canvas….” In vivid (many would say cartoonish) prose, the bad guy shoots him. But there is a deep mystery to solve!

One more big opening: The Bourne Identity, by Robert Ludlum. The story begins thusly: “The trawler plunged into the angry swells of the dark, furious sea like an awkward animal trying desperately to break out of an impenetrable swamp. The waves rose to goliathan heights, crashing into the hull with the power of raw tonnage; the white sprays caught in the night sky cascaded downward over the deck under the force of the night wind.” Wow! And on the deck of this vessel struggling to stay afloat under the weight of its adjectives, two men are engaged in mortal combat. Now that’s dramatic and, as they say in the thriller business, “pulse-pounding.”

The Exceptions

Of course, you can’t have rules without also celebrating the successful exceptions. Consider Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. This iconic novel that launched a literary empire begins with a description: “Mr. and Mrs. Dursley, of number four, Privet Drive, were proud to say that they were perfectly normal, thank you very much. They were the last people you’d expect to be involved in anything strange or mysterious, because they just didn’t hold with such nonsense….”

Here, author J.K. Rowling has decided to introduce the setting before getting into the action. Risky, but it worked.

So what’s the answer? It comes in two parts. 1) No matter what you do, don’t be boring. 2) Deliver what you promise. Keep your reader happy and engaged!

Posted in Essays, Grammar and Writing Skills, News, Novels | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Power of Storytelling in Business Books

When you think of the salient characteristics of a non-fiction self-help business book, what comes to mind? At first, you might expect such a book to be a “how-to” manual, with instructions on how to accomplish a specified goal. The objective might be how to get a promotion, or increase employee retention, or ignite profitable innovation. In each case, a problem is defined and a solution offered. It’s all very logical. Of the four types of writing—persuasive, narrative, expository, and descriptive—you might expect to see mostly expository, which is used to explain a concept and share information with the reader. Expository writing focuses on the facts of a certain topic and provides evidence, statistics, or results. It’s the type of writing you find in newspapers, textbooks, and this article.

There’s nothing wrong with expository writing in small doses, but when used exclusively in a 50,000-word book, it quickly becomes deadly dull. This is because if you want someone to really learn something—and learning begins with both curiosity and focus—the most effective way is to tell them a story.

When we’re children, we learn how to live in society through stories. Take Aesop’s Fables, for example. Everyone knows the story of the wise, industrious ants versus the foolish grasshopper. The hardworking ants store food for the winter, while the silly grasshopper dances around all day without a care in the world—at least until the first frost! By then it’s too late, and he is doomed.

Or how about the hare and the tortoise. The foolish hare assumes he will win the race, and dilly-dallies along the way. The steady tortoise keeps plodding along at his own speed, and is the first to cross the finish line. How many businesses are operated like the tortoise? How many are like the hare?

Science Validates Stories

How people learn is a complex subject, but at least one research study has revealed that schoolchildren learn about a topic most effectively when it’s in story form. At the University of Bath, children who were taught about evolution in the form of stories read by their teacher had higher levels of retention compared to those who were taught by completing tasks. This makes a lot of sense, because stories are much easier to remember than random facts. With the tortoise and the hare, you begin by remembering the hare taunted the tortoise… there was a race… the hare leaped ahead… the tortoise started slowly… the hare stopped for a nap… the tortoise won! Each scene follows logically from the one before it, like rows of dominoes falling. Your memory can easily go from one scene to the next.

Stories and Business Books

This is why the best business books tell stories to validate the lessons they teach. Generally, in any self-help book, you want to do three things, in this order: state the problem, provide your solution to the problem, and then provide some sort of proof or evidence that your solution works. If the story is true, it’s called a “case study.” You can use a case study from the industry you’re discussing, or one from your own professional experience.

A business book can also take the form of a fable, like the tortoise and the hare, or a series of short stories that illustrate your solutions. The second-best-selling business book of all time (after Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill) is Rich Dad, Poor Dad by Robert T. Kiyosaki. It’s written in the style of a set of parables, supposedly based on Kiyosaki’s life. But you don’t need to use humans as your protagonists; another bestseller is Who Moved My Cheese, by Spencer Johnson. Here, the story rests on the slender shoulders of four characters: two mice, “Sniff” and “Scurry,” and two “Littlepeople,” named “Hem” and “Haw.” They live in a maze, and they look for cheese, representative of happiness and success.

One of my favorite animal business books is The Bee Book: A Tale of Leadership and Change, by Craig Smith and Paul Rigby, in which a hive of bees is faced with a catastrophic change in their environment, and they need to take quick action if they are to survive. Another good one is The Path to Leadership: An Amazing Story of Challenges and Personal Growth, by Ronnell Crittenden, about a young lion who needs to find his mission in life, and sets off on an arduous personal journey of discovery.

If you really want to teach someone a valuable life lesson, tell them a story!

Posted in Business Books, Grammar and Writing Skills, Self-Help Books | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Editing Fiction and Non-Fiction: Two Different Approaches

In my nearly two decades of professional book editing, I’ve had the pleasure to serve hundreds of authors of non-fiction (self-help, business, health) and fiction (novels). I’ve found that the two genres of authors have very different expectations, greatly affecting how I work with them.

Non-Fiction Authors

First, non-fiction authors. Their books tend to have a practical purpose, generally centered around helping the reader solve a problem. The problem could be how to live a healthier and happier life, reduce pain, lose weight, get a date, become less stressed-out, succeed at work, enjoy a brilliant career, dress for success, save energy, cure a disease, help save the earth from pollution—the variety of subjects is almost endless. Of course, the author must have their own proprietary solution to the stated problem, but the foundation of any self-help book is a sense of pragmatism.

For this reason, non-fiction writing is most often expository, designed to explain a concept and convey information. Narrative, persuasive, and descriptive approaches are used less often.

In every self-help book, the two most important questions are, “What is the problem? What is the solution?” My job as an editor is to help the author answer those questions. For that reason, authors tend to be objective about what they’ve written, and don’t take criticism personally. When editing, sometimes I need to recommend drastic changes and re-writes. I may suggest re-ordering chapters, deleting redundant text, adding stories or case studies, or even changing the title. (Titles are always tough!) When the author understands why changes are necessary, they’re generally happy to go along. The goal is to make a difference in the life of the reader.

Fiction Authors

My valued clients who write novels have a very different attitude. Even if a novel has a strong point of view, it’s very different from a self-help book. A self-help book is a work of science, while a novel is a work of art. You can value a self-help book based on its ability to spur the reader into action, while there is no such yardstick for a novel. A self-help book comprises a logical progression of ideas, while a novel may be more of a patchwork.

Authors of novels are much more emotionally attached to the words they have written. They tend to be much more resistant to suggestions that something needs to be changed. More times than I care to count, I’ve reviewed a scene in a novel and gently informed the author that there was a part that I didn’t understand, or seemed confusing, or (most commonly) just wasn’t believable. (I’ve written before about how your novel doesn’t have to be real, but it must be believable.) In response, the author is likely to say to me, “Oh, you don’t understand. Such-and-such is the way it is because of so-and-so. I cannot change it.” They don’t realize that when a reader a thousand miles away picks up their book, the author cannot be at their side, explaining his or her choices. The reader has only the words on the page.

It’s difficult to edit a novel because fiction is highly subjective. What one reader finds ridiculous, another will find enthralling. What one thinks is boring, another will proclaim to be a literary triumph. I cannot tell you how many times I’ve bought a highly celebrated novel only to put it down after twenty pages, thinking, “Why am I reading this nonsense?” And I’m sure I enjoy many novels that many critics would dismiss.

When editing a novel for a valued and talented client, a very light touch is required! This really is their “baby,” into which they may have poured their heart and soul, and sometimes you may have strong opinions about it, but you need to be very diplomatic. I always remind my fiction clients that a novel is a work of art, and often it’s not a matter of being “right” or “wrong,” but of saying, “It is what it is.”

Thomas Hauck ghostwriter
Posted in Essays, News, Novels, Self-Help Books | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How Long Should Your Book Be?

Many of my valued clients ask me, “How long should my book be?”

My answer is, “Your book is like your legs. Your legs should be long enough to reach the ground. Your book is no different.”

They think for moment, then reply, “Don’t be a wise guy. How long should my book be?”

Then I ask them to sit back, get comfortable, and I’ll explain it to them.

The basic rule is this: Your book should be the exact length needed to tell your reader everything they need to know, or are capable of knowing, about your chosen subject. This means that book length depends upon three factors.

1. Your reader. You should always write to your audience. This is true whether you’re writing a non-fiction self-help book or a novel. You cannot deliver more or less than your audience is likely to want or accept.

For example, if you’re writing a middle grade novel (ages 8-12), you’ll generally plan on 20,000 to 50,000 words. For a young adult novel (ages 13-18), the typical word count range is 60,000 to 90,000 words. If you’re writing a self-help book to teach college students how to dress appropriately for an interview and while on the job, you should keep it concise at no more than 40,000 words. It could even be a free 5,000-word ebook. If you’re writing an adult science fiction fantasy novel, you could exceed 100,000 words with no problem.

Time matters, too. If you think your reader has many hours to spend devouring every word of your masterpiece, then you can make it longer. If you think your reader is a busy person with little spare time, then your book should be on the short side.

2. Your depth. By this I mean the degree to which you’ll dig into your subject. I always tell my clients that you can write about any topic endlessly. It’s up to you to decide how deep you want to go, which is also a factor of how much your reader can absorb.

You could design a financial planning book for seniors to be a 10,000-word ebook. The same book could be expanded to 30,000 words for a printed paperback. If you want to be truly comprehensive and target ultra-high-net-worth readers, you could publish a 60,000-word hardcover.

You could write a 1,000-word ghost story as flash fiction. You could expand the same story to a 40,000-word novella. The next step would be a novel, which is anything over 50,000 words.

For example, the classic horror novel Frankenstein began in 1816 as a hurried short story written Mary Shelley when she was just eighteen years old. Encouraged by her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley, she kept working on it, giving it more depth, and two years later she published it, anonymously, as a full-length novel of roughly 70,000 words. Then in 1831 she published a revised edition, under her own name; this is the one we most often read today.

In the world of fiction, stories like this are very common; works evolve over time. In extreme cases, full-length feature films can be based on the slimmest of short stories. “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” by F. Scott Fitzgerald, was originally a 26-page short story published in Collier’s in 1922. In 2006 it was released as a 166-minute feature film starring Brad Pitt. And how about Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 film, 2001: A Space Odyssey, which grew from a super-short 8-page story by Arthur C. Clark entitled “The Sentinel,” which he wrote in 1948 to enter into a BBC contest.

3. Your budget. Yes, money matters! On one end of the spectrum, if you want to write a book, you could do it yourself for free. Just start writing! Then you could get a literary agent for free, and land a publishing deal that could earn you millions of dollars. This is what happened to Stephen King with Carrie, J.K. Rowling with Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, and many others. It could happen to you!

But many authors are not, in fact, writers. They can’t or won’t take on the challenge, so they hire a ghostwriter. Nothing wrong with that! But ghostwriters charge by the word, so the longer your book, the more you pay. Good ghostwriters charge anywhere from $5,000 for a short book to $100,000 or more for a prestige memoir. What you’ll pay depends on the length and the complexity of the project. And if you self-publish, or use a subsidy publisher, you’ll need to get out your credit card, because book manufacturing and promotion can cost you more than you spent writing it.

So to get back to the original question… How long should your book be? Weigh the three factors carefully and set your target word count. But don’t worry—you can always change it!

Posted in Advice on Hiring a Ghostwriter, Business Books, Essays, Memoirs, News, Self-Help Books, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Your 3 Choices: Self-Publish, Subsidy Publisher, or Book Deal

When I work with a client as their ghostwriter or book developer, one of the first questions they ask me is how they should publish and market their book. I explain to them that many artists and creators, including musicians, filmmakers, and writers, have faced this question. The fact is that creating a work of art—a book, a record album, a film—takes time and money. After you’ve created your work, if you want to reach a wide audience, you need to invest in marketing and distribution. It’s not unlike launching a small business! The job of marketing the product can often be bigger than making it!

Film projects are highly capital-intensive, and it’s standard procedure for a film director to have a financial partner in the form of an investor or executive producer. Likewise, music recording projects usually involve a record company that pays the bills. But books are different, because it’s entirely possible for one person to write a book without any outside financial assistance. Anyone can write a 90,000-word book for free! The emerging author may find themselves with a finished product they own 100 percent and unencumbered by outside ownership interests.

So the author asks me, “Now that my manuscript is done, how should I publish it?”

If you’re an author, you have three choices.

1. Self-Publish

Publishing a book requires various tasks. They include editing, designing the book interior, designing the cover, arranging for distribution, and handling promotion, including getting reviews. The same is true for music albums and films. When you self-publish, you act as your own project manager and investor. You either do these things yourself or you hire people to do them on a contract basis. You oversee their work. This takes time and money, but the upside is that you have complete control over your product. You own it 100 percent. Every penny of sales goes into your pocket.

The advantage of self-publishing is that you can create whatever art you want! You can write your book or record your music exactly as you want, with nobody to tell you to change. If you sell ten copies or ten thousand, it’s your book and no one else’s.

2. Subsidy Publishing

In the old days, this was called “vanity publishing,” and was considered second-class. But times have changed, and subsidy publishing has become a big business. Subsidy publishing is when you pay a company to act as your project manager and handle all the tasks that you would otherwise do yourself. Most subsidy publishers sell package deals because they want you to spend as much as possible. Their job is to “upsell” you. You can pay, say $5,000 for a basic package that will cover getting your physical book printed, or $10,000 for printing and marketing and promotion, and so on. Subsidy publishers like to pretend they’re selective and require you to submit your manuscript for “approval,” but they’re just pre-qualifying you for a sale.

How about your copyright? There’s a subtle difference between your copyright and your publishing rights. If any subsidy publisher requires you to assign them your copyright, run for the exit! That’s crazy and stupid. Why should you give up your copyright to a company that you are hiring and paying? No way! But many will ask you to assign exclusive publishing rights to them, which means you can’t turn around and hire some other publisher to also publish your book. From a practical standpoint this makes some sense because you don’t want two versions of your book on the market at the same time. But still, it seems creepy. Imagine if you hired a company to paint your house, and they asked you to sign a contract promising not to hire any other company to paint your house.

The biggest complaint I hear from my clients about subsidy publishers is that they don’t perform. People say to me, “I paid thousands of dollars to a publisher and months went by, and they kept giving me excuses about why my book wasn’t published!” This is because they make you pay up front, and if they’re unsavory or just dumb, they can do nothing, and then it becomes your job to try to get your money back. It’s not easy—once they have your money, it’s difficult to extract it from them.

3. Traditional Publishing

The traditional publisher—either an independent or one of the Big Five—signs you to a contract and pays all the costs associated with your book. They may even agree to advance you cash against anticipated royalties. The biggest “book deal” to date was $15 million advanced to President Bill Clinton in 2004 by Knopf for his memoir, My Life. This sum was equaled in 2023 by Gallery Books (Simon & Schuster) for their advance to Britney Spears for her memoir, The Woman in Me.

Traditional publishers offer massive platforms and blue-chip reputations. They do all the work, and all you have to do is make the rounds of talk shows and book signings. But for many of my business clients, traditional publishers are unacceptable for several reasons.

1. They control your product. They can change the title and compel you to make editorial changes. Your book becomes part of their brand, and they’ll change it to fit their brand. One of the most famous name changes happened in 1998 when Scholastic bought the rights to Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the first Harry Potter novel by JK Rowling. For the American market, Scholastic insisted that the word “philosopher” would be misunderstood, and suggested instead Harry Potter and the School of Magic. Rowling disliked that idea, and eventually they settled on Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. When the film version came out, the difference was retained: Warner Bros. kept “philosopher” in the U.K. and most markets, while substituting “sorcerer” in the United States.

2. Your book is part of their production schedule. Many of my clients have been offered major book deals, but the publisher will say, “You’ll be slated for publication eighteen months from now.” Many authors just don’t want to wait that long.

3. Some small publishers will do nothing for your book. I have personal experience with this. About ten years ago I was offered a deal for a thriller I had written called Avita Doesn’t Love You. The publisher was Whiskey Creek Press, which I think is now defunct. They took my rights for seven years. In return, they hired an “editor,” who returned the 80,000-word manuscript with literally not one change except the removal of a handful of occurrences of the word “that.” WCP designed a crummy book cover, published it strictly as an ebook, and stuck it on their website. That was all they did. Without a doubt, I could have done a better job of it myself. Avita sat there, year after year. I began writing letters demanding release for non-performance. Finally, they replied and agreed to relinquish the rights and return my book to my control.

Such horror stories are common in book publishing, the music industry, and the film business. The ironclad law is this: If you agree to let another entity publish your work, and they make any level of investment, you now have a business partner. Your partner could be terrific or they could be terrible.

If you do it yourself and pay for it yourself, you own your product. It’s a deal that an increasing number of my clients can’t refuse. But whichever path you take, you owe it to yourself to be an informed and aggressive advocate for the book that carries your name.

Thomas Hauck ghostwriter editor
Posted in Business Books, Essays, News, Novels, Self-Help Books | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What Does It Mean to Be “Happy”? Hedonism vs Eudaimonism

People talk a lot about happiness. It’s even enshrined in the United States Constitution: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

But what do we mean when we say we’re happy? Is it laughing at a joke? Getting your dream job? Finding the love of your life? Beating your friend at a game of tennis? Writing a bestselling book?

Not everyone agrees on what should make you happy. Some people have unusual or even repellent ideas of what makes them happy, and even take pleasure in the suffering of others.

 It’s an important question that people have pondered for centuries. The ancient Greeks thought about it. They came up with the twin concepts of hedonism and eudaimonism, which both revolve around the concept of happiness and well-being, but approach it from different perspectives and have distinct implications for how one should lead their life.

Hedonism

The term “hedonism” finds its roots in the Greek word “hedone,” signifying “pleasure.” The ancient Greek philosopher, Epicurus, stands as a central figure in the development of hedonistic philosophy. He established Epicureanism, a school of thought prioritizing the pursuit of pleasure as the ultimate good. Contrary to common misconceptions, Epicurus envisioned pleasure beyond mere instant gratification, encompassing intellectual pursuits and long-term contentment. He contended that tranquility and the absence of distress (“ataraxia”) were pivotal for genuine happiness.

Another ancient Greek school of thought, the Cyrenaic school, led by Aristippus of Cyrene, similarly advocated hedonism, but they stressed the importance of seizing immediate physical pleasures and living in the present moment. They prioritized tangible sensory gratifications over abstract intellectual pursuits, embracing a philosophy of “eat, drink, and be merry!”

Eudaimonism

In contrast, Eudaimonism stems from the Greek term “eudaimonia,” often translated as “happiness,” but also as “flourishing” or “fulfillment.” Eudaimonists argue that the ultimate objective of human life lies in attaining a state of well-being and fulfillment through virtuous and purposeful living. This is unrelated to whether or not such activities produced sensual pleasure. For example, launching and building your own business, and working sixty hours a week to keep it afloat, may involve very little hedonistic pleasure but may produce considerable eudaimonic satisfaction.

Remember when Mick Jagger sang, “I Can’t Get No Satisfaction”? In his rock star life at the time, he probably got all the hedonistic pleasure he wanted. But what he was talking about in the song was something deeper, which, while he may not have called it by that name, was closer to eudaimonism.

Aristotle was a primary proponent of eudaimonism. His ethical framework, expounded in the Nicomachean Ethics, laid the groundwork for eudaimonism as a prominent ethical theory. Aristotle’s ethics are teleological, focusing on the final purpose (“telos”) of human life. He posited that human existence’s ultimate aim is to lead a virtuous and meaningful life, achieved through the cultivation of moral virtues.

Aristotle introduced the notion of the golden mean, proposing that virtues reside between the extremes of deficiency and excess. For instance, courage lies between cowardice and recklessness. He emphasized practical wisdom, or “phronesis,” in navigating ethical dilemmas, advocating for morally balanced decisions tailored to specific contexts.

Crucially, Aristotle underscored that eudaimonia necessitated active engagement within a community or polis (city-state). Living virtuously and contributing to society’s common good were deemed essential for attaining eudaimonia.

A Happy Medium? (No Pun Intended.)

To get back to our Founding Fathers, it was Thomas Jefferson who wrote that famous line, and he never explained exactly what he meant. But in a letter to William Short, a former neighbor and private secretary who had served him in Paris, Jefferson bluntly stated, “I am an Epicurean.” But not in the way we often think. Jefferson asserted that Epicurus was profoundly misunderstood by Greek and Roman philosophers and as a result, the contemporary world. His view, it seems, could be defined as “moderate hedonism,” where the enjoyment of life is never taken to excess and is used to uplift rather than squander. Enjoy your glass of wine at dinner, but don’t get hammered.

Which brings us to books and literature. We’ve all read novels that are blatantly hedonistic, and deliver thrills and arouse the senses. We’ve all read novels that are eudaimonic, and seek to enlighten and uplift. Perhaps the very best ones are a mixture of both?

Posted in Essays, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment