Thomas Hauck
Toggle Menu

Thomas Hauck, Editor: Notes on Capitalization

The rules of capitalization – when to capitalize words and when to write them in lower case – are complex and can seem baffling. Inconsistencies abound, even in professional publications and major media sources. In business writing, though, there is a general tendency to overuse capitalization. Business writers like to capitalize common nouns based on their perceived importance. There is a great deal of confusion about job titles, corporate division identifiers, and all the other elements that comprise a business operation, and the default choice seems to be to capitalize.

Here is a sample of the usage you’ll see in business writing:

“The Division Manager spearheaded the Company’s Downsizing Initiative (DI) by outsourcing all Call Center operations, trimming Health Care costs, and establishing a Human Resources website for job pre-screening. John Jones, XYZ Company Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, applauded the efforts.”

It should be:

“The division manager spearheaded the company’s downsizing initiative (DI) by outsourcing all call center operations, trimming health care costs, and establishing a human resources website for job pre-screening. John Jones, XYZ Company chairman and chief executive officer, applauded the efforts.”

You know that when CEO John Jones sees this in print, he’s going to want to see his job title capitalized!

When I edit, I try to adhere to the Chicago Manual of Style as much as possible, keeping in mind the business client’s attitude towards capitalization. Generally, in any document the only words that are capitalized are proper nouns. These include specific proper names of people or things.

Words that can be capitalized include:

– Job titles when used as part of a proper name, such as President Helen Jones.

– A specific proper name, such as the Arizona Public Welfare Project.

– Acronyms, such as WIC, USA, R&D.

– A specific document, such as the 2010 Annual Report.

– Headline capitalization should be applied consistently. Generally, freestanding headlines should be capitalized:

CEO Susan Morlock Attends Trade Show in South America

Subheads, where there isn’t an extra line between the subhead and the next line of text, need not be capitalized.

Here are nouns that are not capitalized:

– General terms like annual report, cost-benefit analysis, project management, income statement.

– Job titles including chairman, division manager, bank teller, janitor.

– Divisions such as call center, marketing division, board of trustees, research & development.

– The Chicago Manual states that college and university degrees are not capitalized: bachelor’s degree, master of business administration (MBA). But you do capitalize proper names: bachelor’s degree in French. This rule is routinely broken on resumes (Jenny earned her Bachelor of Arts degree in Fine Arts).

Business writers tend to capitalize common nouns when they refer to a specific noun previously cited. In a company document, The Smith Project may be referred to as the Project. The Ford Motor Company is referred to as the Company. This seems to be a practice borrowed from legal documents and contracts. It’s not correct, but it’s very common.

The most important thing is to be consistent. If you choose to capitalize Company, for example, make sure that you apply your rule consistently throughout your document.

Thomas Hauck ghostwriter, book editor, author

Thomas Hauck – ghostwriter, editor, proofreader. From his office in Gloucester, MA, an hour north of Boston, editor Thomas Hauck provides professional proofreading, ghostwriting, and book editing services for authors in the Boston area, New England, the United States, and worldwide. For unmatched personal service, contact Thomas Hauck today.

 

Posted in Essays, Grammar and Writing Skills, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Job Interview Skills 101” by Ellyn Enisman, edited by Thomas Hauck

I’m delighted to announce that the new book by my client Ellyn Enisman is now available on Amazon.com. Prior to publication, Ellyn, who was referred to me by another valued client, Karen Batchelor, asked me to edit the book and make sure that it was polished to diamond perfection. She was a pleasure to work with!

Job Interview Skills 101 is an indispensable resource for new college grads who need to jump into the job market. Ellyn covers everything including interview prep, what NOT to say, what a prospective employer can and cannot ask you, what to wear. It’s a great gift idea for the new grad.

From his office in Gloucester, MA, an hour north of Boston, editor Thomas Hauck provides professional proofreading, ghostwriting, and book editing services for authors in the Boston area, New England, the United States, and worldwide. For unmatched personal service, contact Thomas Hauck book editor today.

Posted in Books Edited by Thomas Hauck, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thomas Hauck, Editor: Should Proofreaders Perform Research?

A client recently asked me whether a freelance proofreader should be expected to verify matters of content in a report or article. For example, a report may claim that “studies indicate that college-educated people have fewer children.” Is the freelance proofreader required to verify this statement?

The answer I gave was that freelance editors and proofreaders are generally responsible for correcting obvious visible mistakes, such as the spelling of a well-known person’s name. This is the kind of thing that can be verified in seconds by using Google or Wikipedia, and we all do it routinely.

When I work for Target Direct Marketing, one of my long-term and valued clients, we proofread direct-mail letters several times. As part of the process we are often required to verify phone numbers, URLs, addresses, and other specific content. This is usually a simple matter: you just dial the phone number or go online to the URL.

Matters of non-specific content are very different. To verify what studies may or may not have produced certain results can take hours of research. Most freelance proofreaders are not paid by the hour, they are paid a flat rate. So you can see how this presents a problem. Unless you agree to pay an hourly rate for research, it’s not something that an ethical proofreader will agree to do. And even if the proofreader claimed to have done the research, you, the client, have absolutely no guarantee that the work was done reliably. A proofreader could say, “I spent three hours verifying these statements,” but you have no guarantee unless the sources are provided.

The only difference is in academic or peer-reviewed papers, where the research is fully cited.

If you hire a ghostwriter to produce a report, then you have some expectation of veracity, but as always, buyer beware.

And, not to sound cynical, but everyone knows that a “recent study” can be found to prove just about anything!

Thomas Hauck ghostwriter, book editor, author

Thomas Hauck – ghostwriter, editor, proofreader. From his office in Gloucester, MA, an hour north of Boston, editor Thomas Hauck provides professional proofreading, book editing, and ghostwriting services for authors in the Boston area, New England, the United States, and worldwide. For unmatched personal service, contact Thomas Hauck today.

Posted in Essays, Grammar and Writing Skills, News, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Lucas Manson” Review by Brizmus

Another book blog review of “Lucas Manson” was posted online today. It’s at Brizmus Blogs Books.

Here is an excerpt:

“Lucas Manson is a solid, extraordinarily creative story. It’s engaging and refreshing in a totally unexpected way. It’s a totally fresh and unique take on the idea of vampires and vampirism (though really, vampire is the wrong word here), and I was thrilled to finally have a book that doesn’t look on vampires in a completely positive light. I loved his explanation for what “vampires” are and how they came to be. The idea of two different “homo” species diverging in such a way, creating homo sapiens and homo cruentus, who are addicted to blood, came across as absolutely brilliant to me.”

–Brizmus

Posted in Book Reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thomas Hauck, Editor: Ghostwriting, Editing, and Proofreading

This post is a reprint of a short guide to hiring a ghostwriter, editor, or proofreader that I send to many of my clients.

Your Guide to Ghostwriting, Editing, and Proofreading

Since the days when monks wrote on parchment, people have needed documents to be written. You may require a full-length book, a business white paper, or text on your company website. Perhaps your book or report must be written from scratch, or you may have existing text that needs improvement. You may be an accomplished writer who needs a second set of eyes on your document. But in every case, you want your words to be the very best they can be. You need to find a professional who can help you.

Here’s a quick guide to ghostwriting, editing, and proofreading that can help you to determine whom you need to hire and what you can expect.

Ghostwriter

When you either don’t have the time or the expertise to write a lengthy document such as a book, you can hire a ghostwriter. This skilled professional collaborates with you to bring your ideas to the printed page. The ghostwriter will write the book based on your input, and depending upon the agreement you will retain full copyright. The book may be sold or offered under your name alone, or you may choose to credit your ghostwriter.

Ghostwriters are usually hired on the basis of a word count. For example, if you were to hire a ghostwriter to write a book about how to start a law firm, you would need to specify the word count. Non-fiction books, such as self-help books and memoirs, can be nearly any length above 25,000 words. E-books can be as few as 10,000 words. For fiction, a short novel is generally between 50,000 and 80,000 words. A full-length novel is above 80,000 words.

Specifying the number of pages can be difficult, because the page count will vary depending upon size of the text, margins, and chapter breaks. However, for a typical document in 12-point Times New Roman with one-inch margins, you can expect to get about 500 words per page. So a document of 200 typewritten pages would be about 100,000 words. But when hiring a ghostwriter, it is always better to agree on a word count. It is measurable and there is no ambiguity.

A ghostwriter may give a price estimate based on a flat rate for the project, or based on a price per word (say, ten cents per word, which is average). Good ghostwriters do not get involved with graphics or cover art; writing is a highly specialized occupation and most good writers just write.

Editor

You hire an editor when you have a complete or nearly complete book or report. The editor reads the entire document and helps you to organize and present your thoughts as effectively as possible. The editor may suggest adding material or deleting passages that aren’t effective. In this process it pays to have an open mind, because many authors are sensitive about their work and it can be difficult to be objective. You want an editor who is easy to work with. You do not want an editor who is bossy and won’t explain why he or she favors certain changes. It’s your book and your name on the cover!

Editors can be paid a flat rate for the project, or can be paid by the hour. A good editor will gladly give you an estimate in advance. Then, as the work progresses, you should review the results and only when you know you are in agreement should you continue. There should never be any surprises. Ask your editor to use the “track changes” feature on your word processing application.

A line edit is in between a full edit and proofreading. In a line edit, the editor will ensure that every sentence reads properly, but will not address larger issues of theme or continuity.

When deciding questions of grammar and punctuation, I use the Chicago Manual of Style. It is a highly regarded industry standard. But there are others, and you may specify to your editor which style you want to follow. No matter which style you choose, the key is consistency. For example, if you choose to write out numbers below ten (one, two, three, as opposed to 1, 2, 3), this should be done consistently throughout the document. But in cases where there is some ambiguity, the bottom line is always readability: does it make sense?

At the end of the process you can expect a polished document. But if the work is substantial (say, over 5,000 words), minor mistakes may remain. This is because no matter how skilled, human beings tend to read what they expect to read, and will miss mistakes. Quality documents, such as published books, professional websites, and business reports, are often read by several different people.

A professional editor will always work closely with you to preserve your voice and your personal vision. Your story is unique, and whether your style is chatty or hard-boiled or academic, your editor should always be in tune with your expressive voice.

Proofreader

When you have a finished book or document, you hire a proofreader to check for mistakes of grammar and spelling, to fact check, and to correct typographical errors. A proofreader will not interject his or her editorial opinion about the content of your work.

Do not think that proofreaders are not highly skilled. A good proofreader will know correct punctuation (when to place a semicolon instead of a comma, for example). A good proofreader will have a thorough knowledge of English vocabulary and grammar (when to say “ensure” rather than “insure,” or “farther” rather than “further”). In addition, if your document is industry-specific, such as a financial advisor website, your proofreader must be familiar with the technical language. These details are very important to any professional document. One needless mistake on your business website or in your book may cause a reader to go elsewhere.

Like editors, proofreaders can be hired on a per-word basis or by the project. You should get a firm estimate in advance. Unlike editing, which can be highly subjective, proofreading is more straightforward and therefore it?s easy to give an accurate estimate.

A word about typos

Your professional proofreader will make every effort to correct every typo – spelling, punctuation, capitalization, quotes, apostrophes, dashes, and spacing. But I always tell my clients that no human being, no matter how much you pay them, can catch every typo, even seemingly obvious ones. You need multiple sets of eyes. In offices where I work on key documents we always have at least four people sign off on each page of text. And person number four always finds mistakes! If your document or book needs to be perfect, you owe it to yourself to have it proofed by at least two people other than yourself.

What you can expect

The most important thing to remember when hiring a ghostwriter, editor, or proofreader, is that the job will go much more smoothly if you are very clear in your instructions and expectations. Agree on the word count. Do not ask an editor to “add something if you think it needs it.” The fact is that any document of any length can be expanded into a book. And any book can be made into a longer book.

An editor is like a taxi driver. You get in the cab and the meter starts running. When you arrive at your destination you pay the agreed-upon price. If you say, “Can you drive me another ten miles?” that’s fine, but the cabbie will keep the meter running. It’s only fair.

Choose a provider who has a flawless working knowledge of American and/or U.K English. You get exactly what you pay for. Countless clients have hired cut-rate editors and writers only to receive poor-quality work that is riddled with elementary mistakes. Then they have to hire a professional to do the work again, and the job ends up costing more than if they had hired the pro in the first place.

PDF or Word file?

When you hire an editor or proofreader to work on your document or manuscript, there is one ironclad rule:

No one can edit a pdf file.

You must provide the editor or proofreader with a text document such as a Word document. The less formatting in the document, the better.

The ONLY exception to this is when you have a finished product ready to print and you need a proofreader to proof it for minor typos or production mistakes prior to publication.

One final note about formatting for publication

Today, books can be released in various formats: as e-books, print-on-demand (POD), as pdfs, or other formats. Generally, the fee that you pay to an editor or ghostwriter does NOT include final formatting for publication. This is because there are dozens of elements that need to be coordinated, including headers, page numbers, margins, section breaks, indexes, and tables of content.

When the editing or proofreading job is complete, most editors will deliver to you a standard letter-sized Word document with one-inch margins. All the internal features, such as headlines and subheads, will be in place. Their job is done. If and when you need your document formatted for publication, then this is a separate job with a separate fee. You can negotiate this with your editor.

Remember that your website or report or book may be read by thousands of people. It’s your reputation and your name on the cover. It’s worth it to make sure that every word is perfect.

Thomas Hauck ghostwriter, book editor, author

Thomas Hauck, Editor. From his office in Gloucester, MA, an hour north of Boston, editor Thomas Hauck provides professional proofreading, ghostwriting, and book editing services for authors in the Boston area, New England, the United States, and worldwide. For unmatched personal service, contact Thomas Hauck book editor today.

Posted in Essays, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Lord of the Flies”

This post really isn’t about the classic 1954 novel by William Golding. A dog-eared copy sits on my bookshelf, its slender (208-page) profile overshadowed by bulkier modern thrillers, and some day I will get around to writing a blog about it.

I’m writing because I happened to see in the “Los Angeles Times” a book review of a new Golding biography by John Carey. It turns out that “Lord of the Flies” was not always recognized as a milestone of literature; it very nearly never got published. To paraphrase the article by Nicholas Delbanco:

William Golding’s first three novels went unpublished – and “Lord of the Flies” was nearly a miss until the editor at Faber and Faber, Charles Monteith, rescued the manuscript of “Flies” from the refuse pile. Monteith reversed the decision of a professional reader (hired by Faber and Faber) who pronounced this verdict: “Time: the Future. Absurd & uninteresting fantasy about the explosion of an atom bomb on the Colonies. A group of children who land in jungle-country near New Guinea. Rubbish & dull. Pointless.”

It is an inspiration to every aspiring writer or musician or actor. Never give up – you never know when lightning may strike.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-william-golding-20100711,0,4155311.story

Posted in Book Reviews, Essays | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Thomas Hauck, Editor: Detail in Fiction

As I mentioned in my previous blog, writers of fiction often grapple with the question of detail: how much, what kind, and how far off the narrative track you can stray in order to present an irresistible tidbit of information about a character, setting, or action. If you skimp on details you run the risk of presenting a bland, opaque story that goes bump in the night but never shows its face. Too much detail will bog down your story the way those gigantic tail feathers on the male peacock inhibit free movement.

Here’s an example. Recently I read “The Apostle,” a thriller by Brad Thor. The author is hugely successful in the marketplace and he knows his audience and he caters well to them. Personally, I find his right-wing politics to be heavy-handed and I resent the feeling that the author is leaning over my shoulder and hissing, “Get it? Get it? The liberal politicians are all idiots and the valiant warriors are all heroes!” It seems very Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld, and it’s no wonder Glenn Beck swoons over Mr. Thor and his novels. But I digress; we are discussing novelistic detail. One of the primary tasks of the author is to introduce characters. If you are masterful, you can get them onstage and into the action seamlessly, without a lot of fanfare. But sometimes you need to stop and give a quick physical description.

While plowing through “The Apostle” I noticed that Mr. Thor has a habit of providing the exact height, in feet and inches, of characters as they are introduced. Mullah Massoud Akhund “stood about five-foot-eight.” Zwak “stood only a hair above five feet tall.” The unfortunate interpreter Sayed was “five-foot-six.” The American Dr. Julia Gallo was “five-foot-ten.” U.S. President Robert Alden ‘stood six-foot-two’ while entertainment titan Stephanie Gallo”was tall, five-foot-ten when not in heels.” The information comes quickly; Mr. Thor introduces all of these characters within the first thirty pages. As I read the book, I was amazed that Mr. Thor’s editor at Simon and Schuster didn’t say, “Do we really need to provide these measurements?” But I suppose when you have a sales record as enviable as Mr. Thor’s and your books pay many salaries at the publishing house, no one is going to argue with you.

Some authors omit detail that you assume they would have to include. One of my favorite books is “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley. When you read the book it is obvious that the nineteen-year-old author had a solid understanding of the particulars of the geographical regions used as settings, but zero knowledge of biology or chemistry. She makes no attempt to describe how the creature is brought to life. The description of how Frankenstein animates his creation is as substantial as a Scottish mist. There are vague references to collecting body parts and the laborious assembly process involving scientific instruments. The moment that the creature becomes animated is not marked by any of the theatrics we see in the movies: no thunder and lightning, no flash of cosmic energy. The “dull yellow eye of the creature” simply opens and the daemon awakes and the story marches forward.

By the way, to veer off-track for a moment, does anyone notice that during the daemon’s first big speech to Frankenstein on the glacier of Mont Blanc, he uses the archaic “thee” and “thou” when addressing his master, Frankenstein? In subsequent scenes – including when they repair to the hut so that the monster can tell his story, and later, after Frankenstein destroys the monster’s bride – the monster uses the conventional “you.” The appearance of the archaic forms is puzzling, and the only possible explanation is that Ms. Shelley intended the monster to speak thusly but, after trying it out in the first scene, abandoned the idea as too cumbersome.

Another of my favorite authors, Ian Fleming, weaves fascinating details through his James Bond books. Here is a typical passage; it’s from the first James Bond novel, “Casino Royale.” Bond is at the bar with his new CIA buddy Felix Leiter, and he is ordering drinks. Bond addresses the bartender: “A dry martini. One. In a deep champagne goblet.Three measures of Gordon’s, one of vodka, half a measure of Kina Lillet. Shake it very well until it’s ice-cold, then add a large thin slice on lemon peel. Got it?” A few sentences later he samples the drink and advises the bartender that next time he should use vodka that is made from grain, not potato.

Later in the book Fleming explains that Bond brings a fastidious attention to detail to every facet of his work. He also has Bond reveal that as single man who travels constantly, he has developed a habit of demanding only the very best, as a sort of compensation for the lack of conventional comforts. Does it have anything to do with advancing the plot? Not really. But part of the attraction of the Bond books is that they are highly readable; the plot is not the only thing that holds your attention. The books are simply fun to read, even if you have read them many times before and know every twist and turn of the plot.

And in the particular case of the martini, we learn of the ingredients because we overhear Bond tell the bartender, not because the author has informed us directly. It’s a neat variation on the rule that writer’s workshop professors endlessly repeat: “Don’t tell – show!” Okay, okay. But more about that in another post.

One of the greatest examples of detail can be found in the “Curious George” books in the person of The Man with the Yellow Hat. This is all that we are told about him in the text. We don’t even know his name. He is simply the man who wears the yellow hat. This one descriptor is enough to have created an indelible character who has endured for decades.

Thomas Hauck ghostwriter, book editor, author

Thomas Hauck, Editor. From his office in Gloucester, MA, an hour north of Boston, editor Thomas Hauck provides professional proofreading, ghostwriting, and book editing services for authors in the Boston area, New England, the United States, and worldwide. For unsurpassed personal service and a free quote on your book edit, contact Thomas Hauck book editor today.

Posted in Essays, Grammar and Writing Skills | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Brief Comment About Book Criticism by Thomas Hauck, author

Having spent most of my adult life in the entertainment business (first in rock music, then in book writing), I’ve experienced both positive and negative reviews of my work. These experiences have allowed me to draw some conclusions about how to respond to criticism and how a critic can offer an opinion that is useful rather than merely attention-getting.

A case in point is a recent review of my novel “Lucas Manson,” posted by Daniel Nighting on the book review blog “Reading for Sanity.” As reviews go, it was pretty rough. Scathing, in fact. Mr. Nighting had plenty of negative things to say about my book, and nothing positive.

But unless a negative review discourages people from buying the book, it’s not necessarily a bad thing. The fact is that an artist can often learn more from a negative review than a positive review. A reviewer who writes, “This book is great!” or “I was captivated from beginning to end!” is offering praise but is not offering useful information to the author as to how he or she can be a better communicator. But the reviewer who says, “The plot was too simplistic” or “The lead character was thinly drawn” is offering useful information that an author can consider for the next project.

Mr. Nighting, aside from expressing his general disdain for”Lucas Manson,” made a few specific comments. In particular, he disliked the amount of detail: the Bakelite elevator button, and the descriptions of what the characters ate at various meals. Fair enough; these are choices that I made and if he doesn?t like them then I’ll think about how I can write more effectively in the future. Whenever an author includes a small detail, you never know whether it’s too much or whether, as you hope, it allows the reader to become part of the scene. We all try to avoid needless or empty detail; somehow every bit of information that you give to the reader has to have meaning or relevance to the story. For example, in Homer’s “Odyssey,” there is no little time devoted to describing the meals: the selecting of the lamb or cow, the slaughtering, the cooking of the meat (always wrapped in fat), and of course the oft-repeated mixing of the wine. Could the story survive without these descriptions? Probably. Would it be as much fun to read? No.

Negative comments can be useful. But it is up to the critic to be careful and responsible. In his review, Mr. Nighting states that Lucas Manson and the members of his “Evil Cult of Darkness” are “vampires,” and “pathetic” ones at that. This is where his comments become useless and silly. The definition of a”vampire,” and one that with some variations every conventional romantic vampire novel follows, is “the reanimated body of a dead person believed to come from the grave at night and suck the blood of persons asleep” (Merriam-Webster). In my book I deliberately did not use this term to describe Lucas Manson. Manson and his followers are not vampires; they are perfectly ordinary hominids who go out in the sun and eat regular food. They cannot become bats and they cannot avoid mortal death. They don’t sparkle and they don’t have sharp teeth. What they have is an addiction to human blood, just like a junkie is addicted to heroin. And if each one doesn’t get his or her pint of blood every week, they undergo horrific withdrawal. As the leader of his people, Manson’s problem is simple: he has to feed his growing flock. It’s a business. It’s not romantic and it’s not always fun. Is Minister Manson a bit of a buffoon? You bet, just like most petty dictators are. He is wrapped up in creating his own mythology, and to ordinary folk he seems outsized, like a Macy’s parade float full of hot air. He’s more Mussolini than Dracula.

Mr. Nighting states that the “vampires” in “Lucas Manson” are “pathetic.” What does this mean? That they are not super-powerful? That they cannot sprout wings and fly? That they have ordinary human characteristics? What Mr. Nighting?s comment really means is that Mr. Nighting had a preconception about the book and about vampires. I can only surmise that he must have wanted the characters in “Lucas Manson” to be like the conventional vampires he has experienced in fiction and enjoys reading about. They are not, and therefore the characters did not fit his preconception of what a vampire ought to be. This reveals a rigidity of thinking and an unwillingness to approach a book with an open mind.

It would have been much more useful if Mr. Nighting had said, “I understand what the author was trying to do, and here is how he utterly failed.” Or even, “I cannot figure out what the author is trying to do!” Unfortunately, his comments reveal more about his own personality than offer validation of his activities as a book critic.

Should I, the author, address this problem? Perhaps I could put a big banner across the book’s cover that proclaims “Lucas Manson Is NOT a Vampire.” How about this one: “Lucas Manson: The Vampire Book Satire.” Or I could go in the other direction and edit the book to make Lucas Manson more vampire-y and romantic. But that would be no fun.

Perhaps the best way to do it is to keep plugging away and doing the best I can to be original and provocative and entertaining.

Lucas Manson cover

Posted in Book Reviews, Essays | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“Pistonhead” Review by the Kari AnnAlysis

Thanks to Kari for a nice review of “Pistonhead” on her blog “The Kari AnnAlysis”:

http://kariannalysis.com/

It’s encouraging that over a year after publication the positive reviews keep coming!

Posted in Pistonhead | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Why I Wrote “Pistonhead” by Thomas Hauck

Recently, Josette from “Books Love Me” posted a review of “Pistonhead” and she asked me to write a guest blog for her website. Here it is. You can see the blog and Josette’s review here:

http://www.booksloveme.com/

In writing “Pistonhead,” I had several goals that I wanted to accomplish. I hope that I have succeeded. Here is a brief review of what I hope readers will take away from the book.

Having spent fifteen years in the music industry as a rock musician, I wanted to give readers a glimpse into the everyday life of a struggling artist. Charlie Sinclair is not a superstar who travels to stadium gigs in a private jet; he holds down a day job and can barely pay his bills. Pistonhead (the band) have released several CDs but are still playing the club circuit around Boston, Massachusetts.

The book opens on a Thursday night and Pistonhead are playing a gig at the Big Ditch Club in Boston. Unfortunately, it is almost show time and the band?s drug-addicted lead singer, Rip, is nowhere to be found. In the nick of time he shows up and the band tries to win over an unruly audience. After the show, at three in the morning, Charlie returns to his mouse-infested apartment. But there is little time to rest; four hours later he has to get up to go to work at Evergreen Software, where he is a supervisor on an assembly line.

This is the life that I wanted to show – a grueling life shared by many creative people (writers, actors, musicians, artists) all over America. I wanted to illustrate that the creative life of songwriting and playing gigs is not that much different from working on an assembly line. Songs must be written and rehearsed and recorded; quality must be maintained; inferior products must be abandoned. The marketplace rules.

The deeper theme of the book is this: how do you define success? Charlie and his bandmates assume that success is measured by how many CDs you sell or how many people attend your concerts or how many groupies you attract. But when tragedy strikes and the fate of Pistonhead hangs in the balance, Charlie has to decide what really matters to him. Is it creativity, or is it material success? With the help of his new love interest (a young woman who is decidedly not a groupie), Charlie is able to take a big step forward in his life.

Many people ask me if “Pistonhead” is autobiographical. I will only say that about two-thirds of the scenes and events in the book are absolutely real. I won’t say which two-thirds. But I will testify that the very talented lead singers in the bands I worked with were not like Rip – they were totally professional and were never late for a show. I will also say that the Mass Rehab characters and scenes in the Evergreen Software factory are one hundred percent authentic – even the guy who thought that he was possessed by Satan. That particular scene happened exactly as written.

My newest novel is “Lucas Manson,” a horror thriller. When FBI Special Agent Mark Dylan investigates a brutal double homicide, he enters the mysterious world of the Kingdom Seven Family Temple, a growing cult headed by the charismatic millionaire Minister Lucas Manson. As Dylan and his partner Jill Kelly probe deeper into the hidden world of the temple and its sinister practices, they are forced to question their own identities, and soon they learn that friends cannot be distinguished from enemies – and that their lives will change forever. It’s available both in paperback and as an e-book.

Pistonhead

 

Posted in Pistonhead | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment